Scientists at the medical school are conducting hundreds of clinical trials daily. Learn more about our work via the Feinberg Office of Research Clinical Trials page, and find specific trials by searching for a disease or condition below.
For pediatric clinical trials, visit the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago website.
For more information on neuro-oncology clinical trials, visit the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University website.
Please contact Chris Amidei, Director of Clinical Research at 312-695-9124 or email@example.com for more information on trials.
RELIEF: A Global Registry to Evaluate Long-Term Effectiveness of Neurostimulation Therapy for Pain (A7007)
The purpose of this study is to compile characteristics of real-world clinical outcomes for Boston Scientific commercially approved neurostimulation systems for pain in routine clinical practic…
The purpose of this study is to compile characteristics of real-world clinical outcomes for Boston Scientific commercially approved neurostimulation systems for pain in routine clinical practice, when used according to the applicable Directions for Use and to evaluate the economic value and technical performance of Boston Scientific commercially approved neurostimulation systems for pain in routine clinical practice.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
-Study candidate is scheduled to be trialed, on-label, with a commercially approved Boston Scientific neurostimulation system for pain, per local directions for use
-Signed a valid, IRB/EC-approved informed consent form
-18 years of age or older
Key Exclusion Criteria:
-Contraindicated for Boston Scientific neurostimulation system
-Currently diagnosed with cognitive impairment, or exhibits any characteristic, that would limit study candidate's ability to assess pain relief or to complete study assessments
Precision Retrospective Outcomes (PRO)
This study will evaluate deidentified (anonymous) data in subject medical charts to review the clinical outcomes of spinal cord stimulation.
-Previously treated with or eligible for implantation with a spinal cord stimulation system
-18 years of age or older at the start of Baseline
Radiographic Markers of Clinical Function in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM)
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), also called “spinal stenosis,” is a common cause of injury to the cervical spinal cord (the neck). CSM can cause pain in the neck and arms, as well as weakness and loss of coo…
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), also called “spinal stenosis,” is a common cause of injury to the cervical spinal cord (the neck). CSM can cause pain in the neck and arms, as well as weakness and loss of coordination in the neck, arms, hands, legs, and feet. Although CSM is common, there is still a question of how findings on imaging such as x-rays or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relate to a person’s symptoms. The purpose of this study is to see how the images and symptoms of people with CSM compare to images of healthy people without CSM. We are looking for healthy volunteers to help us gain valuable insight into how medical imaging can help us diagnose CSM.
Participants must be 21 years of age or older, preferably 40 years of age or older. Participants may not have any previous spine surgeries or chronic neck pain.
rTMS: A Treatment to Restore Function after Severe TBI
The purpose of this study is to address the need for targeted treatments that induce functional and structural changes in the brain, ultimately improving neurobehavioral functioning, the investigators propose examining the therapeutic effectiven…
The purpose of this study is to address the need for targeted treatments that induce functional and structural changes in the brain, ultimately improving neurobehavioral functioning, the investigators propose examining the therapeutic effectiveness of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). The objective is to improve functional recovery for persons remaining in vegetative (VS) and minimally conscious (MCS) states 3 to 12 months after severe TBI. The approach is to determine the neurobehavioral effect of rTMS, the relationship between neurobehavioral changes and net neural effects, and to identify and define the neural mechanisms related to neurobehavioral improvements by providing 30 active or placebo rTMS sessions.
-Veteran of any combat era
-History of Post Traumatic Amnesia < 1 day for mild TBI; 1 day> x < 7days for moderate TBI))
-Ability to obtain a Motor Threshold (MT) will be determined during the screening process.
-If on a psychotropic medication regimen, that regimen will be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to entry to the study and patient will be willing to remain on a stable regimen during the acute treatment phase.
-Has an adequately stable condition and environment to enable attendance at scheduled clinic visits.
-For female participants, agrees to use one of the following acceptable methods of birth control: abstinence, oral contraceptive; Norplant
-Able to read, verbalize understanding, and voluntarily sign the Informed Consent Form prior to participating in any study-specific procedures or assessments.
-Pregnant or lactating female.
-Unable to be safely withdraw, at least two-weeks prior to treatment commencement, from medications that substantially increase the risk of having seizures
-Have a cardiac pacemaker or a cochlear implant
-Have an implanted device (deep brain stimulation) or metal in the brain (see standard MRI exclusion criteria including metal screening section in telephone screen, Appendix A).
-Have a mass lesion, cerebral infarct or other active central nervous system (CNS) disease, including a seizure disorder.
-Known current psychosis as determined by DSM-IV coding in chart (Axis I, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia) or a history of a non-mood psychotic disorder.
-Diagnosis of Bipolar Affective Disorder (as determined by chart review and intake interview)
-Current amnesic disorders, dementia, mini mental state examination (MMSE) 24 or delirium.
-Current substance abuse (not including caffeine or nicotine) as determined by positive toxicology screen, or by history via AUDIT, within 3 months prior to screening
-Prior history of seizures
-Severe TBI or open head injury
-TBI within last two months or in acute stage
-Participation in another concurrent clinical trial
-Patients with prior exposure to rTMS/ECT
-Active current suicidal intent or plan. Patient at risk for suicide will be required to establish a written safety plan involving their primary psychiatrist and the treatment team before entering the clinical trial
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Pilot Study of the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System for the Treatment of Post-Amputation Pain
The purpose of this study is to determine if electrical stimulation (small levels of electricity) can safely and effectively redu…
The purpose of this study is to determine if electrical stimulation (small levels of electricity) can safely and effectively reduce post-amputation pain. This study involves a device called the SPRINT System. The SPRINT System delivers mild electrical stimulation to nerves in the residual limb. The SPRINT System includes a small wire (called a "lead") that is placed through the skin in the upper leg. It also includes a device worn on the body that delivers stimulation (called the SPRINT Stimulator).
Key Inclusion Criteria:
-At least 18 years old
-Traumatic lower extremity amputation(s)
-Healed amputation and healthy residual limb based upon the investigator's evaluation
Key Exclusion Criteria:
-Change of prescribed medications affecting pain within the past 4 weeks
-Compromised immune system based on medical history
-Implanted electronic device
-History of valvular heart disease
-Confounding central nervous system injuries and disorders
-History of recurrent skin infections
A Phase 2b/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of VX-210 in Subjects With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of VX-210 in subjects with Acute Traumatic Cervical …
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of VX-210 in subjects with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Secondary objectives include the specific evaluation of the effects of VX-210 on neurological recovery and daily function after spinal cord injury.
Acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), motor level of C4, C5, or C6 on each side (C4 subjects must have at least 1 point of motor activity between C5 and T1 on each side).
American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A or AIS grade B.
Scheduled and planned to undergo a spinal decompression/stabilization surgery that commences within 72 hours after the initial injury.
Computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is consistent with the subject's neurological deficit.
Participation in any other clinical study for acute SCI.
Inability to undergo decompression/stabilization surgery that commences within 72 hours after injury.
One or more upper extremity muscle groups untestable during baseline American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) examination.
Acute SCI from gunshot or penetrating/stab wound; non-traumatic SCI (e.g., transverse myelitis, acute disc herniation); brachial plexus injury; complete spinal cord transection; or multifocal SCI.
Females who are breastfeeding or have a positive serum pregnancy test.
Body mass index (BMI) of ≥40 kg/m2 at screening.
History of an adverse reaction to a fibrin sealant or its components.
Unconsciousness or other mental impairment that precludes reliable International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination.
Known immunodeficiency, including human immunodeficiency virus, or use of immunosuppressive or cancer chemotherapeutic drugs.
Any significant medical or psychiatric comorbidities that would significantly increase the risk of study enrollment and/or significantly interfere with study outcomes or assessments, in the judgement of the investigator.
A Double-Blind, Controlled Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Modified Stem Cells (SB623) in Patients with Chronic Motor Deficit from Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
The primary purpose of the clinical study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of intracranial administration of SB623 cells on p…
The primary purpose of the clinical study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of intracranial administration of SB623 cells on patients with chronic motor deficit from Traumatic Brain Injury. A secondary purpose of the study is 1) to evaluate the effect of intracranial administration of SB623 cells on disability parameters and 2) to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intracranial administration of SB623 cells. Patients with stable, chronic motor deficits secondary to focal traumatic brain injury must be 12 months post TBI.
•Documented history of TBI, with correlated MRI or CT
•At least 12 months post-TBI
•Focal cerebral injury able to be identified on MRI (+/- concomitant diffuse axonal injury)
•Neurological motor deficit substantially due to focal cerebral injury observed on MRI
•GOS-E score of 3-6 (i.e. moderate or severe disability)
•Require Motricity Index 10-81 (UE Scale) and/or 10-78 (LE Scale)
•Able and willing to undergo computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
•Subjects must be willing to participate in study related exercises to the extent possible
•Able to undergo all planned neurological assessments
•History or presence of any other major neurological disease
•Any seizures in the prior 3 months
•The presence of contracture at any joints that would interfere with interpretation of any of the neurological assessments (e.g. contracture preventing the detection of any increase in the range of motion or ability to perform a task)
•Other neurologic, neuromuscular or orthopedic disease that limits motor function
•Clincially significant finding on MRI of brain not related to TBI
•Known presence of any malignancy except squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
•History of CNS malignancy
•Positive findings on tests for occult malignancy, unless a non-malignant etiology is confirmed
•Uncontrolled systemic illness, including, but not limited to: hypertension (systolic >150 mm Hg or diastolic >95 mm Hg); diabetes; renal, hepatic, or cardiac failure
•Uncontrolled major psychiatric illness, including depression symptoms (CESD-R Scale of ≥16)
•Unexplained abnormal preoperative test values (blood tests, electrocardiogram [ECG], chest X-ray); x-ray evidence of infection; uncontrolled atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled congestive heart failure
•Presence of craniectomy (without bone flap replacement) or other contraindication to stereotactic surgery
•Participation in any other investigational trial within 4 weeks of initial screening or within 7 weeks of study entry
•Botulinum toxin injection, phenol injection, intrathecal baclofen, or any other interventional treatments for spasticity (except bracing and splinting) 16 weeks priot to the Baseline visit.
•Ongoing use of other non-traditional drugs
•Substance use disorder (per DSM-V criteria, including drug or alcohol)
•Contraindications to head CT or MRI
•Pregnant or lactating
•Female patients of childbearing potential unwilling to use an adequate birth control method during the 12 months of the stu
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing EG-1962 to Standard of Care Oral Nimodipine in Adults with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
This study compares EG-1962 to oral nimodipine in the treatment of aneurysmal subarac…
This study compares EG-1962 to oral nimodipine in the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Ruptured saccular aneurysm confirmed by angiography and repaired by neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling
External ventricular drain in place
Subarachnoid hemorrhage on computed tomography (CT) scan of grade 2-4 on the modified Fisher scale
WFNS grade 2, 3, or 4
Major complication during aneurysm repair such as, but not limited to, massive intraoperative hemorrhage, brain swelling, arterial occlusion or inability to secure the ruptured aneurysm
Angiographic vasospasm prior to randomization
Evidence of a cerebral infarction with neurological deficit