Presenting Author:

Yanina Guevara, B.A.

Principal Investigator:

Sofia Garcia, Ph.D.

Department:

Medical Social Sciences

Keywords:

breast cancer, survivorship care plan, post-treatment

Location:

Ryan Family Atrium, Robert H. Lurie Medical Research Center

C32 - Clinical Women's Health Research

Piloting Cancer Survivorship Care Planning in a Safety Net Hospital

Background: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) include treatment summaries and follow-up care recommendations intended to improve patient care and well-being after cancer treatment. Limited research has yielded mixed results regarding SCPs' impact on patient and system outcomes, but emphasized provider burden as an implementation barrier. We created a patient-centered SCP template and implemented its delivery at a safety net hospital that serves primarily racial/ethnic minority patients. Methods: In a single-arm feasibility study, oncologists and advanced practice nurses used the template to deliver SCPs to post-treatment breast cancer survivors (BCS) in consultation visits. We assessed changes in patient-reported outcomes from baseline (pre-SCP) to a 3-month follow-up, as well as provider time burden. Results: Female BCS participants (n=75; mean age=58.5 years) were primarily African-American (73%) and had high school/GED education or less (61%). Average time since diagnosis was 3.7 years (SD=3.8); all received surgery; most received radiation (84%), hormone (77%), and/or chemotherapy treatment (73%). At follow-up, a majority rated their SCPs as good to excellent (92%), easy or very easy to understand (84%), a good to excellent summary of their treatment (92%) and as motivation for healthy lifestyles (88%). BCS follow-up scores improved significantly from baseline on breast cancer knowledge (p=.02), self-efficacy (p=.03), the QLQ-INFO25 (p<.01), and the FACIT TS-PS satisfaction with health care staff communication subscale (p<.01). No significant differences between baseline and follow-up scores (p<.05) were found for overall treatment satisfaction, health behaviors, and health-related quality of life. Preparing and delivering SCPs took providers considerable time (M=54 & 22 minutes, respectively). Conclusions: This pilot study is limited by a single-arm design, but results suggest that SCPs may be related to improved survivor knowledge, information, self-efficacy and communication with health care staff. The individualized, comprehensive SCPs were well received by BCS in a safety net hospital but delivery was time-intensive. These findings will inform future research trials and clinical care initiatives