Go to Northwestern University's homepage; this page will open in a new windowGo to the Prosthetics Research Laboratory and Rehabilitation Engineering Research Program homepage
Go to the Feinberg School of Medicine homepage; this page opens in a new window
Go to the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science homepage; this page opens in a new window
Go to NUPRL & RERP HomepageView information on how to Contact Us
About UsResearchLab NewsPublicationsPersonnelFacilitiesRelated LinksLink to our NIDRR RERC pageLink to page describing how you can get involved
Lower-Limb Prosthetics
Print This Page
Upper-limb Prosthetics
Lower-limb Prosthetics
Spinal Studies
Orthotics
CAD/CAM

 

Header for "How You Can Participate:" section
Link to "Research Participants Needed" flyer
Bottom image of "Lab Notice" section

Pilot Study: Application of Roll-over Shape Toward
Evaluation and Design of Partial Foot Prostheses

Dudley S. Childress, PhD and Steven A. Gard, PhD, Principal Investigators
Andrew H. Hansen, PhD, Project Director

Co-Investigators:
Stefania Fatone, PhD; Rebecca L. Stine, MS; and Kerice A. Tucker, Northwestern University
Robert D. Lipschutz, CP, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Michael Dillon, PhD, La Trobe University, Australia
Scheck and Siress Prosthetics, Orthotics and Pedorthics

Student Investigator:
Pinata H. Sessoms, MS

Funded by: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)

Purpose

Different types of partial foot amputations
Different types of partial foot
amputations: a) Lisfranc,
b) transmetatarsal, and
c) meta-tarsalphalangeal. 

A partial foot (PF) amputation, in theory, should be superior to a transtibial or Symes amputation because the physiologic ankle joint is preserved.  Persons with PF amputations should generally be able to walk without their prosthesis, if only to walk to and from the toilet during the night.  The remaining ankle and subtalar joints in cases of toe and transmetatarsal amputations (TMAs), should allow these persons to more readily adapt to different terrains compared to more proximal amputations (e.g. Lisfranc and Chopart), where the ankle and subtalar joints are lost or compromised.  The decision to mechanically limit ankle joint motion may be based on many factors including the need to reduce forces acting on the distal end of the residuum, inability to transfer the remaining ankle motion to the device in a short PF amputation, or to insure suspension of the device.  In cases of short PF amputations such as Chopart, the ankle joint may be surgically fused to provide stability for the remaining foot bones.  While in theory a PF amputation should be more advantageous than a transtibial amputation, the walking performance on level ground of persons with PF prostheses is often reduced in comparison with the performance of persons using transtibial prostheses.  This is due in part to problems with the tolerance of the residual foot to weight-bearing forces and difficulties with the fitting and performance of P&O devices.  We believe that roll-over shape principles, which we have established from our examination of non-disabled walking, can be used to enhance the understanding of a range of currently utilized PF prostheses-orthoses.  We also believe that roll-over shape can be used to design highly functional devices for persons with PF loss.

Related Publications

Dillon, M., Hansen, A. and Fatone, S. (2008). Influence of marker models on ankle kinematics in persons with partial foot amputation: an investigation using a mechanical model.  Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 45(4).

Fatone, S. (2007). Studies of the Biomechanics of Gait of Persons with Partial Foot AmputationCapabilities, 15(4):3-4.  Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

Hansen, A., Dillon, M. and Fatone, S. (2008). Source of Increased Dorsiflexion During Gait of Persons with Partial Foot Amputations when Shod or in ‘Below-Ankle’ Devices.  Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists, February 27 – March 1, Orlando, FL.

Sessoms, P., Fatone, S. and Hansen, A. (2008). Case Study: Gait Analyses of Persons with Partial Foot Amputation Walking Barefoot and With Dorsiflexion Stop Ankle Foot Orthoses.  Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists, February 27 – March 1, Orlando, FL.

Fatone, S. (2008). Biomechanics of Ambulation after Partial Foot Amputation: A Systematic Literature Review.  Invited Speaker in:  Hafner B and Fatone S.  Evidence Reports:  Findings from the SSC on Biomechanics of Ambulation after Partial Foot Amputation (Instructional Course).  Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists, February 27 – March 1, Orlando, FL.

Dillon, M., Fatone, S., Hodge, M. (2007). Biomechanics of Ambulation after Partial Foot Amputation:  Systematic Review.  In:  Symposium―Management of the Partial Foot Amputee.  Invited Speaker, 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, July 29 to August 30, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Dillon, M., Fatone, S., and Hodge, MC. (2007). Biomechanics of Ambulation after Partial Foot Amputation.  Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 19:(8 Proceedings):P2-P61.

Home | Contact Us | About Us | Research | Lab News | Publications | Personnel | Facilities | Related Links

Prosthetics Research Laboratory and Rehabilitation Engineering Research Program
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
345 East Superior St. Room 1441
Chicago, IL 60611-4496
(312) 238-6500 / Fax (312) 238-6510
Email: reiu@northwestern.edu